rtems gcc 4.6.1 can not compile stop at check TLS
sebastien at milkymist.org
Mon Aug 29 16:45:48 CDT 2011
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 16:27 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> + Is this a reasonable and meaningful set?
As far as we are concerned, we only need:
I'm not opposed to keeping the other libraries, nor even having all 16
possible combinations (this number is unlikely to grow, as most of the
LM32 opcodes are already used) - on desktop computers, CPU and storage
are dirt cheap those days. It may seem a bit weird, though, that someone
would ever use e.g. a CPU with only the divider and nothing else, so if
you want to be picky, some combinations can definitely be left out.
More information about the rtems-users