Final Call for Review: Modular SuperCore Scheduler
gedare at gwmail.gwu.edu
Sun Nov 14 17:34:12 CST 2010
For those interested in this project, but not interested in reading code :)
I have written an informative piece on the design and some of the
implementation elements of the modular scheduler.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at gwmail.gwu.edu> wrote:
> I have just uploaded my changes that resolve the issues raised in the
> initial code reviews. The discussion about these changes is logged in the
> PR 1647 (linked in Joel's previous message).
> Since this code is a major re-haul of the supercore thread manager /
> scheduling subsystem, its performance on all platforms is a primary
> concern. I have been able to test the code in the sis and psim simulators
> with the tmtests. If anyone else can run these tests on the pre- and
> post-patched RTEMS for other platforms and post/send results it would be
> useful to flag any other possible issues related to processor architecture
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com>wrote:
>> Gedare Bloom's Google Summer of Code project was
>> to refactor the SuperCore to produce a Scheduler
>> handler. This is a prerequisite on the way
>> to supporting SMP and alternative schedulers
>> like EDF (which he has implemented for RTEMS).
>> He has continued to work with me to resolve the
>> final issues and I think this code is ready
>> to merge. If you want to review it before it is
>> merged, please go to:
>> If nothing turns up and the final performance numbers
>> are OK, I expect to merge this code within the next week.
>> rtems-users mailing list
>> rtems-users at rtems.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rtems-users