Correct return values for _Objects_Get_class()?

Joel Sherrill joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Wed Oct 24 14:02:30 CDT 2007


Phil Torre wrote:
> On Wed 24-Oct-07 11:17 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>   
>>> Phil Torre wrote:
>>>
>>> Okay, that makes sense.  I will patch our 4.6.0 tree accordingly (and add
>>> this to the case for migrating at least to 4.7).
>>>       
>> And remember that incremental versions along a branch are
>> supposed to be pain-free and bug fix only.  So stopping
>> at 4.6.0 means you missed > one bug fix. :-D
>>
>> --joel
>>     
>
> Well, I tell a slight fib by identifying our version as 4.6.0.  I've
> backported all kinds of patches into our tree since it started out as
> 4.6.0-pre4.  We tend toward "if it ain't broke, etc...", but it's
> clearly time to start considering an upgrade.  (Actually, I'm more
> concerned about gcc-4.x than RTEMS itself.  But it sounds like things
> are settling down; it's been a while with no strict aliasing bug
> discussions. :)
>
>   
Maybe we are all just tired. :-D
> -Phil
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.com
> http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>   




More information about the rtems-users mailing list