timcussins at eml.cc
Tue Oct 23 09:31:51 CDT 2007
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:06:50 -0500, "Joel Sherrill"
<joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> said:
> Leon Pollak wrote:
> > Thank you, Tim.
> > The issue you write is clear for me.
> > But reading the docs, I was sure that partition is thread safe. Also, looking
> > into the code shows a lot of enable/disable thread dispatch.
> > Is not this enough?
> partitions are supposed to be thread safe. They are based upon
> supercore chains and the partition get and return use chain
> operations which disable interrupts during get/append operations.
> It should be very safe.
True. Maybe you're overflowing a buffer and writing into the header of
the next one?
Sorry to mislead you on the thread-safety thing.
More information about the rtems-users