[rtems commit] 2011-03-02 Ralf Cors épius <ralf.corsepius at rtems.org>

Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsepius at rtems.org
Sat Mar 3 00:20:14 CST 2012

On 03/03/2012 06:33 AM, Thomas Doerfler wrote:
> Ralf,
> Am 03.03.2012 04:12, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
>> On 03/02/2012 08:51 PM, Thomas Doerfler wrote:
> ...snip...
>>> Can you please explain why you now take the right to commit
>>> non-conforming patches and instead insult other people?
>> I do not see I insulted Gedare. I feel his remarks originate from
>> inexperience of lack of understanding of the importance of
>> ChangeLog-files and of a VCS's internal ChangeLogs.
> I am glad you didn't intend to insult Gedare, although my limited
> knowledge of the fine-tunings of english gave me a different impression.
As you know, I am not a native English speaker, so their might be 
subtilities of the English language I tripped over, I might not be aware 

> But this doesn't answer the first part of the question.
Which? - The "right"?

Let me turn this around: Who decided upon a change in commit and 
ChangeLog policies? I am not aware anybody did.

I am only aware about some people who out of a sudden changed their 
commit habits (who legitimated them to do so?), in ways I consider to be 
sloppy and to be harmful to the project.


More information about the rtems-devel mailing list