[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

rename issue



Chris Johns wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Chris Johns wrote:
>>> Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>  
>>>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>>    
>>>>> Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>>>        
>>>>>> Looks like we are heading for a new spin of the 4.10 tools
>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>               
>>>>> Yep, .... I am going to address these issues sequentially.
>>>>>        
>>>>>>   + drop - DMISSING_SYSCALL_NAMES from configure.host
>>>>>>               
>>>>> Having cross-checked your proposal, I leaned to agree with your 
>>>>> proposal and am about to launch a toolchain spin.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please test this toolchain! Though this patch is a one-liner, this 
>>>>> step is quite intrusive, and is not unlikely to have (so far) 
>>>>> unconsidered side-effects.
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>> Yeah!  This one worried me.  It could easily turn up a LOT of
>>>> stuff.
>>>>     
>>> What should we be looking for ?
>>>   
>> Symbol clashes/conflicts related to "_"-prefixed function symbols and
>> bogus/redundant <function>_r vs. <function> calls.
>>
> 
> I built all targets installed on rtbf64 late yesterday (my time) and it looks 
> like the new newlib was installed. All targets failed. Here are the results:
> 
> http://www.rtems.org/ftp/pub/rtems/people/chrisj/pq/html/
> 
> The error is the third one down on this page:
> 
> http://www.rtems.org/ftp/pub/rtems/people/chrisj/pq/html/arm-20090506-3.html
I don't understand your report.

For me, all arm-bsps build without any such problem, as well as all 
toolchains did.

Is this a warning/error you observe when building the toolchains?

Ralf