[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Details regarding Bug #1383


I see that this bug was detected on account of another bug - bug #1376
- which says the lseek handler returns an int whereas lseek returns
off_t. Are we waiting for bug #1383 to be fixed in order to fix bug
#1376? Because from the bug report I see that the problem has been
tackled, if not fixed. I have tried to fix the bug #1376 and have
generated a patch which I have attached here. If we are not waiting
for bug #1383 to be fixed, then I request you to kindly review my
patch and tell me if there are mistakes in it.


Santosh G Vattam
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bug1376.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1177 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://rtems.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-users/attachments/20090307/17a9bda8/attachment.bin