[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Details regarding Bug #1383
- Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 21:09:55 +0530
- From: vattam.santosh at gmail.com (Santosh vattam)
- Subject: Details regarding Bug #1383
Hi,
I see that this bug was detected on account of another bug - bug #1376
- which says the lseek handler returns an int whereas lseek returns
off_t. Are we waiting for bug #1383 to be fixed in order to fix bug
#1376? Because from the bug report I see that the problem has been
tackled, if not fixed. I have tried to fix the bug #1376 and have
generated a patch which I have attached here. If we are not waiting
for bug #1383 to be fixed, then I request you to kindly review my
patch and tell me if there are mistakes in it.
--
Regards
Santosh G Vattam
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bug1376.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1177 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://rtems.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-users/attachments/20090307/17a9bda8/attachment.bin