Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius@rtems.org> writes:
[...]
E.g. the m8260 would be superflous, if it could be removed from cpukit.
The code it uses is _identical_ to the 603e, except of 1 define in
cpukit.
Well, which one of the following 8 do you mean? Or am I missing
something?
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/new-exceptions/cpu.h:180: || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/new-exceptions/cpu.h:192: || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/old-exceptions/cpu.h:204: || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/old-exceptions/cpu.h:216: || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/score/powerpc.h:211:#elif defined(mpc8260)
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/score/powerpc.h:461:#elif defined(mpc8260)
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/score/cpu.h:407: || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/score/cpu.h:436: || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))