[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: powerpc-rtems-4.7-gcc-4.0 patch commited



Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius@rtems.org> writes:

[...]

> E.g. the m8260 would be superflous, if it could be removed from cpukit.
> The code it uses is _identical_ to the 603e, except of 1 define in
> cpukit.

Well, which one of the following 8 do you mean? Or am I missing
something?

cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/new-exceptions/cpu.h:180:  || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/new-exceptions/cpu.h:192:  || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/old-exceptions/cpu.h:204:  || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/old-exceptions/cpu.h:216:  || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/score/powerpc.h:211:#elif defined(mpc8260)
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/score/powerpc.h:461:#elif defined(mpc8260)
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/score/cpu.h:407:  || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))
cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/score/cpu.h:436:  || defined(mpc860) || defined(mpc821) || defined(mpc8260))

-- 
Sergei.