[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
code size latest snapshop versus 200206
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:20:07 -0800
- From: strauman at slac.stanford.edu (till)
- Subject: code size latest snapshop versus 200206
Joel Sherrill wrote:
>Chris Johns wrote:
>>Till Straumann wrote:
>>>It's not clear who is really responsible for the net increase
>>>as some things got bigger and some new symbols appear but other
>>>symbols shrunk or disappeared.
>>>There is also noticable fluctuation among small items.
>>I agree. Most items are small excluding the _vfiprintf_r/_vfprintf_r etc. Some call
>>must have been added to bring these in.
>>Not sure why the change has happened.
>If the references to _vfiprintf_r/_vfprintf_r are new, then
>please use the -Map option to ld to find out what is rerfercing it
>and forcing it in.
Hmm - I didn't look at the -Map yet but my guess is that hello world
calls printf who probably
wraps _vfprintf_r, the latter referencing _vfiprintf_r
>I am in the middle of building tools so am not in a good position to
>check other targets. What BSP are you using Peter? If not a PPC one,
>then it is likely some shared support code and we need to find it and
>reduce the dependencies.
>> Chris Johns, cjohns at cybertec.com.au