[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ISR Argument Proposal Request
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:59:37 -0600
- From: joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com (Joel Sherrill)
- Subject: ISR Argument Proposal Request
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> Am Die, 2003-02-04 um 16.21 schrieb Joel Sherrill:
>
> > void _ISR_HANDLER( void *, frame * );
> >
> > with better names. :)
> I have to reiterate my mantra: Please, don't use "void*", I want
> strictly named types.
I hope it is clear to all RTEMS users that any API we have control
over won't have a void * or int as an argument. I would in fact
propose something like:
rtems_isr ISR_Handler( rtems_isr_argument, rtems_isr_frame * );
With rtems_isr and rtems_isr_argument being typedef'ed in
portable code, and rtems_isr_frame being ultimately CPU
dependent.
> Ralf
--joel