[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
build & c tools
- Date: 12 Feb 2003 13:27:07 +0100
- From: corsepiu at faw.uni-ulm.de (Ralf Corsepius)
- Subject: build & c tools
Am Mit, 2003-02-12 um 12.40 schrieb Salman:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 10:35, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Am Mit, 2003-02-12 um 11.00 schrieb Salman:
> > > I'm using standard gnu build programs
> > > (ie automake-1.72, autconf-2.57, aclocal-1.72)
> > > not the rtems ones (eg automake-rtems-automake-1.7.2)
> > > are they any different ??
> > No, at present time, they are identical.
> I'd like to know, why rtems needs to use its own c & build tools, and
> standard gnu tools (no matter how up-to-date they are) would not
The answer is simple:
RTEMS configuration requires the versions of the auto*tools mentioned
above, because all other versions of autotools are not compatible enough
to current autotools or contain bugs RTEMS configuration triggers.
As most Linux vendors currently do not ship these versions with their
distributions, we package our own packages as convenience to users.
These allow you to install them in parallel your vendors packages,
without having to care what they ship or having cope with the new
auto*tool versions interfering with other packages requiring other
versions of the autotools
> Is there any documentation that can answer my question?
I could try to list all the bugs and incompatibilities in autoconf and
missing features in previous versions of automake ;)
> or is the
> question too basic to be documented?
Well, I think nobody has considered it worth being documented ;)