[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
why is RTEMS_VERSION not set?
- Date: 27 Feb 2003 08:10:35 +0100
- From: corsepiu at faw.uni-ulm.de (Ralf Corsepius)
- Subject: why is RTEMS_VERSION not set?
Am Mit, 2003-02-26 um 19.43 schrieb Joel Sherrill:
> Ralf .. is this negatively impacting the string that is _RTEMS_version
> in sapi/include/rtems/sptables.h.in.
It actually is not directly related to _RTEMS_version, it is only
related to _RTEMS_version by the way _RTEMS_version currently is
_RTEMS_version is an external char, we can setup where ever we want
to, by whatever means we want to. So, the way it currently is setup
actually is irrelevant from an application's view.
> I think that string is important.
No. Only existence/presence of the symbol _RTEMS_version is to some
extend important, not it's current implementation.
I say to some extend, because people should be using uname in their
applications instead of using _RTEMS_version directly.