[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
why is RTEMS_VERSION not set?
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:11:27 -0600
- From: joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com (Joel Sherrill)
- Subject: why is RTEMS_VERSION not set?
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Am Mit, 2003-02-26 um 02.09 schrieb Till Straumann:
> > Another one for the autotool wizard ;-)
> > - the subject says it all.
> > Recent snapshots (20021017, 20030128) seem not
> > to set RTEMS_VERSION :-(
> It probably has not been set very much longer ... ;)
> Can you elaborate what you are using it for? RTEMS_VERSION is one of the
> relics of older versions of RTEMS I'd like to see eliminated.
As a side note, I think it would be nice to have some
cpp constants like RTEMS_VERSION_MAJOR, RTEMS_VERSION_MINOR or
something that could be tested in conditional code. It has
been disccused a few times over the years but never got to a
concrete proposal that would be useful to applciations.
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985