[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
R: Bad RUN command on GDB
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 18:06:17 +0200
- From: giuliano.to at tin.it (Giulix)
- Subject: R: Bad RUN command on GDB
Ok so now I ask to Gatliff what he think about my file organization.
----- Original Message -----
From: Radzislaw Galler <rgaller at et.put.poznan.pl>
To: Giulix <giuliano.to at tin.it>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: Bad RUN command on GDB
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Giulix" <giuliano.to at tin.it>
> To: "Radzislaw Galler" <rgaller at et.put.poznan.pl>;
<rtems-users at oarcorp.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 9:42 PM
> Subject: R: Bad RUN command on GDB
> > In the first my intention was to obtain a platform-indipendent stub and
> > stub for Hitachi
> > 7045F in single chip too. So I have wrote a stub organized in many
> > have fixed some bugs
> > in Gatliff's stub. I don't remember if the bug mentioned by you is
> > Actually my stub have a good organization (I think) but is not complete
> > no time for it).
> Maybe it would be a good idea to start a new project on sourceforge. Some
> people (including me) would interested in hepling. This could speed-up the
> > These are the features that actually are NOT supported:
> > - limiting the memory usage (for single chip usage only)
> > - fix some bugs with internal UBC break
> > - support direct internal flash writter
> > - think about 115K serial baud rate
> > - think about using serial SCI with RX interrupt (level 15) to perform
> > program with CTRL-C from host
> > If you want my stub please ask me. Happy to send you
> Happy to get this.
> Think about starting new project on sourceforge. I you use some code from
> Bill's sources it would be also a good idea to ask him if he agrees.
> Sugestion: if you have reorganized the files there is no sense to continue
> previous Bill's project.
> Best Regards