[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Network driver again - thanx
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 11:10:43 -0500
- From: joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com (Joel Sherrill)
- Subject: Network driver again - thanx
"Alexey S. Fadeyev" wrote:
> Thanx - problem really was in my attach function
> But I was confuse that I had to have the same prefix for all my drivers if
I do not believe you have to have the same prefix for all your drivers.
By convention, all drivers from the same chip type normally have the
prefix (sonic0, sonic1, scc0, scc1). But if I had a 68360 system with a
Sonic, I think I could have scc0 and sonic0 as my driver names.
Eric, isn't this right?
> I thin it's not flexible
Could you clarify?
> Anyway - than
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985