[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
rtems-gcc linker warnings
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 09:33:38 -0500 (CDT)
- From: joel at OARcorp.com (joel at OARcorp.com)
- Subject: rtems-gcc linker warnings
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With some-rtems toolschains, freshly build from binutils-2.9.1.0.25,
> newlib-1.8.1 and egcs-1.1.2, all with latest rtems-patches applied, I
> get linker warnings when linking an empty main function:
>
> #cat hello.c
> int main( )
> {
> return 1;
> }
>
> #i386-rtems-gcc -Wall -o hello hello.c
> /opt/rtems/i386-rtems/bin/ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start;
> defaulting to 08048084
> #hppa1.1-rtems-gcc -Wall -o hello hello.c
> /opt/rtems/hppa1.1-rtems/bin/ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol
> $START$; defaulting to 00002000
> #sparc-rtems-gcc -Wall -o hello hello.c
> /opt/rtems/sparc-rtems/bin/ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start;
> defaulting to 00010090
> #mips64orion-rtems-gcc -Wall -o hello hello.c
> /opt/rtems/mips64orion-rtems/bin/ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol
> _start; defaulting to 0000000000400020
>
> #sh-rtems-gcc -Wall -o hello hello.c
> #m68k-rtems-gcc -Wall -o hello hello.c
> #i960-rtems-gcc -Wall -o hello hello.c
>
> Note: This happens without having rtems installed and therefore also
> happens silently during the configuration of RTEMS when bootrapping
> RTEMS (cf. rtems/config.log) and can potentially affect configure script
> checks (Though I did not notice any, yet).
>
> AFAIS all compilers not showing this problem are COFF, while all other
> seem to be ELF. Therefore I guess that this might be related to the
> switch to elf (newlib + crt0 ?).
crt0.c in newlib is supposed to satisfy all the symbols expected. So if
_start is not being defined, then newlib/libc/sys/rtems/crt0.c needs to
define it. Will that take care of the warning?
I know the resulting executable is useless but we knew that all along. :)
--joel