[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Another problem with egcs-1.0.2-prerelease
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 12:02:37 -0600 (CST)
- From: joel at oarcorp.com (Joel Sherrill)
- Subject: Another problem with egcs-1.0.2-prerelease
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998, Eric Norum wrote:
> > #elif defined(mcpu32) || defined(m68360)
> I don't think the latter will work since there seems to be no
> guarantee what symbols will be predefined by the compiler.
OK. Even if it is mcXXXX?
> I don't like the former, either -- feeling crotchety today, I guess.
> Application code may depend on the predefined symbols as well, and
> may not include targopts.h. (also it should be mcpu32, not
targopts.h is implicitily included by rtems.h.
> I think there are really only two options. Either the compiler
> predefines need to be standardized (fat chance...) or the -D flags
> have to go into the xxxx.cfg files.
Now that we know the mc68xxx is predefined, shouldn't the code mbe
modified to use __mcXXX__?